Friday, June 25, 2010

Battle of the Pad’s

This is a bit of a follow-up to the Impressions of Apple's new iPad posting. Looks like Google is looking at doing their own Pad so Google if your listening please don't follow in Apples footsteps producing a large scale toy only working in a narrow use case. Think out of the box give the consumer & the industry a game changing device rather then simply playing games. Give your engineers the room to innovate and knock the ball out of the park I’m looking forward to seeing what you come up with.






Monday, June 21, 2010

Impressions of Apple’s new iPad

Thought I’d pass this along to all interested. I managed to luck out and was able to borrow the Apple iPad for a prolonged period of time. My expectations were high for this device. If met they might actually turn me from my evil Windows and Linux ways and towards the path of Apple enlightenment. From my current experience with this device it appears my false tech gods still have their hold over me. I find this device’s cool factor up there but this is really due to the power of the iPod and not thru any mind blowing Apple Innovation. They seem to have taken the easier ‘larger then the original copy’ approach to this new product instead of trying to hit the ball out of the park. This leaves the usability as a real compute device lacking in major ways. They have missed with this device holding the hope and promise to extend the ability to integrate the compute device into the household environment.

For better or worse, a well-defined consumer based pad device is a combination of a magazine, laptop, game, and multi-media device. This device needs to free the household from the burden of carting your laptop from room to room and be cheap enough to perhaps have more than one. Ideally this device should integrate into your remote control interfaces and your internal network. This being said there is truth to the rule you need to walk before you can run. However this is not an excuse to not attempt to toddle off the carpet.

I found that the iPad was nothing more then a glorified iPod touch which was very disappointing. It’s clear from the feature set, Apple took the easy way out and chose not to lead by example here. This device has no native connectivity to your household network storage or if it does they have buried it in a way that I can’t find. It appears that you need to sync your files onto the device to use the content on your external media. I have an eight terabyte media store. My expectation is to be able to browse, edit, view and sort these files using the iPad. The tools today I have found however require you to sync them onto the device. This sets the device as a content owner and not the content tool. If a Pad is to be successful as a device it must be a tool that interacts with all the various storage and compute devices that are becoming standard fare in the homes today.

Households by nature are multi-tenant/multi-user models of operation. This requires the device to interact with all components of the home media experience, while not to be the sole provider of said content. Without this multi-tenant ability these devices tend to be non-starter from the git-go.

Final Impressions:

  • Ease of use – Very good, after all its the iPod Touch on steroids.
  • Innovation – Poor,
  • This appears to be just a large version of the iPod: shame on you Apple you’re trying to be setting the lead on new innovation these days.
  • Form Factor – Acceptable but I would like a slightly larger screen.

Overall:

  • Good single user device
  • Nice to play games on
  • Nice to browse the web
  • Poor integration with other home and computer devices.
  • Good for reading books …
  • If you need a large format iPod this is the device for you

Friday, June 11, 2010

Peace, Love and Linux

I had to chuckle to myself when I read the article from Paul Ryan Uptake of native Linux ZFS port hampered by license conflict this week. One of the of my 1st projects coming back to EMC a few years ago was to analyze porting ZFS onto the Linux platform. Thru this project I gained a lot of respect for the thought that the Sun folks had put into their software architecture and construction. I learned the things needed for the port were more then achievable. We faced the same kind of dilemma that now confronts the folks in this article the License Issue. My conclusion at the time was, that this would be a non-started. From a software professional I decided I needed to put my 2 cents worth in here. I use the resources and energy the Linux community has on a daily basis,  but I always wrestle with the question of  “Where’s the Money”. I know that the company I work for expects to some form of ROI on my works as they should. I love the principal of open source and the community approach as well. This all being said I’m at a loss as to how to bring these sides together. Oracle/Sun deserves their ROI as much as my company does. boiling this down to a maturity issue in my prospective Linux has clearly done a good job at propagating itself into the industry and user community. ZFS is clearly a suite of software that deserves its chance at revenue generations for its creators whomever they may be. The long and short of it all here isn't that those whom wish ROI are evil, and for the goodness of the community should release their labor without said chance to recoup profits. Moreover we need this to mature in support both models. I can’t tell you how many times I've looked at this problem here and various start-ups, and gone damn if I give that away I’ve lost my companies leverage in the market space. Then had to come up with some overly complex creative solutions that calms the lawyers and meets our product delivery goals. This is not a suggestion to throw the baseline GPL foundation away but we need some form of provision to enable the industry at large to introduce, deploy and maintain their own set’s of components in this ecosystem. In the long term that strengthens both the open source interests as well as the business interests at large.

.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Adventures in Data Movement

By nature I'm a problem solver, so when I see something that should be easier. I tend to try and solve it. With one caveat ‘it has to be interesting’, otherwise all those boring mundane tasks I flee from in the home would be done already. So let's assume that what's upcoming will not only solve a problem, be cool and keep my interest.


Storage is moving into people's lives in ways that we don't notice most of the time. Cell Phones, Camera's and Music Players store things. My teenagers are asking for flash sticks so they can transfer between school and home. You get the picture, while I love this as a storage geek this can get overwhelming for people that don't understand the magic inside the great mysterious box known as the personal computer in any of its forms today.

 
So here's the problem that caught my interest. My wife uses her camera almost every day at work. She is a preschool teacher they build a photo album for each student at the end of the year. This is filled with pictures of the child's interactions thru out the school year. You can see with 40+ students any given term that that's a lot of photos. She is always copying from the camera onto her lap top working away dragging and dropping, sorting then into the proper locations etc. This should be a lot easier, why isn't this like putting your smart phone in the cradle and the data just winds up where it should be. This might answer that question that the computer savvy among us has been struggling with for decades of 'Why didn't it go where I wanted it too?'

 
So let's describe my setup a little bit here so folks understand what we can bring into play to solve this problem

.
My home supports both wired gigabit devices as well as N wireless. The general configuration is if the device is on the 2nd floor, mainly in my office where all the heavy lifting devices are on a gig switch. Devices in the basement, 1st floor and backyard area have access to the N router that is funneled up to the gig backbone. The primary network storage device for the household is an Iomega IX4 this is an approximately 6 terabyte NAS Appliance. All household users have access to this and the goal is that this is where all content will reside for one simple management point. Yes I'm not a simple setup but I warned you I'm a storage Geek what else would you expect.

 
So my plan is to take the data from my wife's camera and get it upstairs onto the IX4 in the right folder solving the age old riddle. If I'm lucky there will be no loss of life, limb or interruption in my game play. This has to be easy to use and behave like docking your phone no more than a button press away

 
The cast of characters:


Iomega Ix4



Iomega iConnect

 

Generic 5 in 1 flash device

 

Flash SD drive from the camera

Assumptions:

  • Your Iomega NAS device is installed and running
  • Your iConnect is installed and running
  • Your multi SD drive works and you have data on the SD device you wish to use

Step 1: Connect to the iConnect Device


My iConnect is open security model it is used as a data pump device as well as exporting our USB DAS to the network as needed. Your mileage may vary here it may have a login screen if you have enabled user security

Step 2: Enter the Backup and Restore menu section on the device

Step 3: Choose Copy Jobs


The storage service I've decided to use for this solution is the Copy Job Service this is a great work horse for custom data movement operation in the Iomega NAS products its supports across the line at a minimum by devices that run the EMC LifeLine software. Once you have reached this menu select the Add button to begin adding a new Copy Job into the system.

Step 4: Add a new Copy Job

When adding a Copy Job there are several pieces of data that needs to be gathered. This data is only gathered once and saved within the system and reused each time the Copy Job is run.

This data contains the following information

  • The Copy Job Name

  • Its overwrite Setting this tells the job system if it should overwrite existing files on the target device. There are several options here. For this task I have left this setting at its default Do Not Overwrite

Now let's start describing the source device information needed. I've left the device as ic01 this is the iConnect device within my home that we will use to plug in the SD flash device reader into.

Step 5: Choose what to copy

Now let's select the what to copy section This is the location on the source device I wish to use To this we will select the what to copy pull down button.

Step 6: Choose source folders

For this project selecting all the folders on this device would create unnecessary clutter on the target device. causing my wife to have search in order to find her new pictures once they have been moved onto the target device.

Once I've changed the setting to the 'selected files and its content', a browse button will appear on the UI this allows me to pick the correct source directory to use. As you can tell I've selected the output folders that my wife's camera stores its new content into..

We can now move onto the target information. I'm choosing a location on my IX4 NAS device to do this. By doing this my wife can connect to her pictures from any device with my household.

Step 7: Choose remote device

By selecting the To Device pull down I see the following choices on my network I've chosen the device IX4-01. This is the host name of my household NAS device.
once selected it's now time to enter all the information necessary to attach to this device.

Step 8: Add target information

The information needed for this select are as follows

  • Protocol: Windows File Sharing

  • Username: Diana

  • Password: ********

The last piece of information is the folder that you wish to use to store the content with. You may enter this information directly into the field or select the Browse button and you can browse the destination for the location

Step 9: Completed copy job

We have just one more thing to select about this copy job that is the run when quick transfer button is pressed. This feature will run this copy job when the device is inserted and the button on the front of the iConnect is pressed. The very last step is to press the apply button and our job is saved for use.

Step 10: Available copy jobs

Once you have completed we now see our copy job in a list of available jobs that can be run.

Step 11: Copy job run report

Checking the status of a copy job is a simple act in the UI as you can see from this run there are no problems, thus the green check. From this screen you would see any error conditions and details if they had occurred.

Step 12: The end results

This is the view of the IX4 NAS appliance from my Windows 7 desktop as you can see the pictures are now under the New Pictures Folder on my wife's share. At this point she can edit, move and sort to her heart's content. She only needs to look here for her new pictures from now on.

In conclusion this was a lot simpler that I thought it would be. The products involved worked well together it honestly too far longer to write this up then to actually do the operations from scratch. Once set up it works well and has a very well understood and predictable end result. My wife likes having her photo at her finger tips and the ease of use that the process provides.